1/24/18 @ 2:34pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: IN YOUR DREAMS
Posts: 1,846
Something seems to be lost here...where is the tease....where is the flirt?
Have to say thank heavens there are a number of performers who stand their ground, engage in conversation and YES do a bit of flirting a long the way.
Quote
Summary: Too many pictures and not enough talking. Color me shocked, Fish! Quote
https://www.flirt4free.com/forums/threads.php?forum_id=5&thread_id=24307&num_posts=7
https://www.flirt4free.com/forums/threads.php?forum_id=5&thread_id=23381&num_posts=6 Quote
1/25/18 @ 6:33pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: IN YOUR DREAMS
Posts: 1,846
https://www.flirt4free.com/forums/threads.php?forum_id=5&thread_id=24307&num_posts=7
https://www.flirt4free.com/forums/threads.php?forum_id=5&thread_id=23381&num_posts=6
Hey JJinUK thanks for the heads up on that. So easy to forget and get carried away.
Quote
1/28/18 @ 3:58am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: California, USA
Posts: 63
Clearly you're new here. GoFish and like 3 other people hate nudity. We have no idea why. Apparently they have some "socially appropriate decorum" fantasy which gets ruined. We're not sure exactly.
In any case, they like telling the rest of us how the rest of the site should be run ... like it was back in 1809 when Flirt was just drawings of women's ankles. Modestly covered ankles of course. Quote
Something seems to be lost here...where is the tease....where is the flirt?
Have to say thank heavens there are a number of performers who stand their ground, engage in conversation and YES do a bit of flirting a long the way.
i think we need more nude MODELS and more nude pictures on here Quote
Clearly you're new here. GoFish and like 3 other people hate nudity. We have no idea why. Apparently they have some "socially appropriate decorum" fantasy which gets ruined. We're not sure exactly.
In any case, they like telling the rest of us how the rest of the site should be run ... like it was back in 1809 when Flirt was just drawings of women's ankles. Modestly covered ankles of course.
Listen...I understand the enjoyment of the right group of people having a good time/chat while in a model's room, but this idea and insistence on returning to the good ole days when models were fully clothed or only teasing while everyone just chatted it up (and likely didn't spend a dime) is just....hilarious to me, for reasons that I won't put out in the forum. Quote
Listen...I understand the enjoyment of the right group of people having a good time/chat while in a model's room, but this idea and insistence on returning to the good ole days when models were fully clothed or only teasing while everyone just chatted it up (and likely didn't spend a dime) is just....hilarious to me, for reasons that I won't put out in the forum.
the good old days like when one of the best models who has ever been on this site would cum for any member in open chat for 250 credits may my friend from Canada r.i.p.
Quote
I actually like when models have multiple photos on their profile, more so when there are some who have been using the same picture for over two years...
Complete nude photos? Where are these pictures? I've seen semi-nude ones at best but it all goes back to the that sex sells. Now, I'm not saying I oppose these kind of pictures but any time I see an attractive guy in a suited/elegant photo I be sure to do a double take
Quote
I actually like when models have multiple photos on their profile, more so when there are some who have been using the same picture for over two years...
Complete nude photos? Where are these pictures? I've seen semi-nude ones at best but it all goes back to the that sex sells. Now, I'm not saying I oppose these kind of pictures but any time I see an attractive guy in a suited/elegant photo I be sure to do a double take
Multiple profile pics are all right when they are at least somewhat different (including zoom ins and zoom outs), but I think what gofish is referring to is when the model has 2 (sometimes more) pics that are almost 100% identical, with only the smallest of changes between the two (like just a very slightly different head angle). For example, some of the large photos posted on the profiles for Johnny Lovee (167) and Andrew Frox (125) are virtually identical. In most cases, though, I think it may be the studios that upload all the pics from the photo shoots rather than the models. On the other hand, you have Stefano, who has a lot of pics on his profile (104), but they are all noticeably different in content and in pose.
https://www.flirt4free.com/photos/guys/johnny-lovee/
https://www.flirt4free.com/photos/guy s/andrew-frox/
https://www.flirt4free.com/models/bios/stefano/photos.php Quote
1/29/18 @ 5:39pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: IN YOUR DREAMS
Posts: 1,846
Plus keep in mind there are some very talented performers who really put a lot of effort into the pictures they post and often in a very creative way. Quote
Clearly you're new here. GoFish and like 3 other people hate nudity. We have no idea why. Apparently they have some "socially appropriate decorum" fantasy which gets ruined. We're not sure exactly.
In any case, they like telling the rest of us how the rest of the site should be run ... like it was back in 1809 when Flirt was just drawings of women's ankles. Modestly covered ankles of course.
Ohh yes, he is new for sure, i bet that s why he doesn t know what people likes here lol Quote
1/29/18 @ 8:37pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,381
Sorry, gofish. That is a very poor point, which weakens your case.
JJinUK helpfully pointed out (post #5) that you had raised this same topic in 2016 and 2017. In the 2017 topic I pointed out that pictures take up very little storage space compared with VODs.
It is rather annoying when you keep repeating the same points over and over again. Even more annoying when you don't appear to read and take on board comments made by other members.
Here are some facts:
1. the average photoshoot picture on this site is about 0.05 to 0.1 MB
2. there are 180,000 pictures in the Photo Archive
3. these take up about 9 to 18 GB of storage
4. the average 5 minute VOD on this site is about 25 to 50 MB (500 times more than a pic)
5. one performer alone has an amazing 16,000 party chat VODs currently available (*)
6, these take up about 400 to 800 GB of storage (assuming each VOD is only 5 minutes long)
7. so one single performer's party VOD collection is at least 40 times more than the entire Photo Archive
8. there are several thousand performers on the site
I hope that is helpful, and settles that particular point.
Having said that, I said in your previous versions of this topic that I agree that it is unnecesary for performers or studios to upload lots of near-identical photos from a single photoshoot. No argument there.
I also broadly agree that there is too much free nudity, although for opposite reasons to you.
In your many topics and posts you have pushed the "personality more important than physical beauty" and "nice words more important than tips" line. You are happy to chat to performers without seeing them perform. That is your personal approach to the site, which you are entitled to. But not to expect everyone to do the same. That has produced predictable responses from Z-Money, FC and others.
As I pay a monthly site membership fee I can see as much nudity as I like in the VODs of my 500+ private shows and the 200 free daily VODs. But I do like to see nudity after the show starts, rather than at the very beginning. So I support "no free nudity" from a different viewpoint.
Oh, and I absolutely loved the wonderful, varied photo collection of current Bitcoin pin-up boy Antonio Valentini before he left the site. He included just 2 or 3 naked photos. Lovely
(*) I mentioned this in the General Discussions forum. Members were complaining about individual private show VODs being purged. I said that Party and Group show VODs could be purged. They take up a vast amount of storage space:
https://www.flirt4free.com/forums/threads.php?forum_id=1&thread_id=4359&num_posts=21
Quote
Sorry, gofish. That is a very poor point, which weakens your case.
JJinUK helpfully pointed out (post #5) that you had raised this same topic in 2016 and 2017. In the 2017 topic I pointed out that pictures take up very little storage space compared with VODs.
Curse you Ronnie!!!
I thought we finally had the reason for all the site mishaps and outages of late! Quote
Plus keep in mind there are some very talented performers who really put a lot of effort into the pictures they post and often in a very creative way.
That's about the lamest damn thing I've ever read. If performers want to post photos, let them post photos.
Quote