again Sex-spert proves he is totally clue less and miss quotes the facts.

he said: "And there was a Rasmussen poll recently that read that 55% of the American people approve of Trump and what he's doing. You just refuse to believe it. I say again, if it were NOT for the biased negative news media, Trump's approval rating would consistently be 55 to 60 percent."

Again he is misstating the facts he said the Rasmussen poll is of the American people. I have pointed out to him before that is NOT true, the polls sample set it is of American VOTERS not American people. (you can verify this on the Rasmussen poll they do not hide the fact). but Sex-spert wants to ignore the facts and miss quote the statistics over and over again. As for the rest of the quote about the approval rate would be..., well even he said he pulled that out of his ass with no way of backing it up. It is Sex-sperts opinion and we all know that is not worth anything as it is not based on facts.

You know what, written by YOU doesn't make it a fact. And there was a Rasmussen poll recently that read that 55% of the American people approve of Trump and what he's doing. You just refuse to believe it. I say again, if it were NOT for the biased negative news media, Trump's approval rating would consistently be 55 to 60 percent.
In the 80s the media called Ronald Reagan the "Teflon President." It wasn't really true, but they called him that. Teflon really described Bill Clinton and Obama, because it didn't matter what scandals they were involved in, how much they lied and deceived the American people or what they did, the media made sure that nothing would "stick" or make them look bad. Whereas today, the media is doing everything they can to make President Trump look bad.
Trump, however, will turn out to be the Teflon President. He is going to do what he's going to do, the media and Democrats won't be able to stop him no matter how much they scream, and he will fulfill his promises. He has already started to. He WILL repeal the health care mess Obama created, he WILL cut taxes and do tax reform, he WILL make sure we drill for oil, he will keep us safe. Nothing will "stick" to him.
I know that the other writers in this thread will always consider Trump to be the most evil, despicable, corrupt human being that ever walked the face of the earth. Your unjustified bias will never change, sadly. But that doesn't matter. Teflon Trump will do everything he has been elected to do, and then nation will be much better off because of it.



Dream your little dream my friend who lives in his own bubble.

The link before was a link with the summary of the result of more than one poll - so it could be considered a tendency - and here'S another link to make it fact again (and for you: the numbers make it fact - not that I think so http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/trump_approval_index_hi story ).
"..Trump's approval rating would consistently be .." Would be ? It isn't. So another trial of you to blabla without facts. This is your personal opinion and again no fact. And rest of what you are writing refers to that blabla - you think that makes it a fact ?
I won't ask you now who is gonna pay for your improvements - such as making a health care which isn't affordable for the poor ones , cutting the taxes for the top ones, building the wall and so on and so on.
Only poor minded believe in Mexicans who pay for it. Stay tuned for the answer. Wait for your better america.
Brave new world and 1984.
I don't consider Trump evil - I just consider him unable for being president. Would he be his own apprentice he would already have heard : You are fired for your incompetence.

Once again, YOU are clueless, Arch. The American VOTERS ARE the American PEOPLE. They are ONE and the SAME. They didn't go out and interview foreigners, they interviewed AMERICANS and it IS legitimate. You just refuse to believe it.
I pull nothing out of my ass like you do. I can just as easily say nothing you say is worth anything.
And it was one polling company that asked all of those questions that were listed in the article. As usual you miss my point that if it weren't for the biased news media, yes Trump would be at least 55 percent approval if not more. I would place money on it. If the bullshit of the media suddenly stopped, we would all see Trump's approval rise dramatically.
He's NOT cutting taxes just for the RICH (another liberal lie that never goes away. It figures you would say that, they always do). He is going to cut taxes for EVERYONE, especially the middle class as much as he can.
You do think he is evil, but let me separate your statement...."just consider him UNABLE to be president." Hmmmm....we had someone in the White House who was totally incompetent and UNABLE to be president and unqualified for EIGHT YEARS. Obama. Trump lives in the REAL WORLD, knows how businesses work, and Trump is a THOUSAND TIMES more qualified than Obama could ever hope to be for the job. Trump's eight years will show everyone what a REAL and qualified individual can do as president.

Once again, YOU are clueless, Arch. The American VOTERS ARE the American PEOPLE. They are ONE and the SAME. They didn't go out and interview foreigners, they interviewed AMERICANS and it IS legitimate. You just refuse to believe it.
I pull nothing out of my ass like you do. I can just as easily say nothing you say is worth anything.
And it was one polling company that asked all of those questions that were listed in the article. As usual you miss my point that if it weren't for the biased news media, yes Trump would be at least 55 percent approval if not more. I would place money on it. If the bullshit of the media suddenly stopped, we would all see Trump's approval rise dramatically.
He's NOT cutting taxes just for the RICH (another liberal lie that never goes away. It figures you would say that, they always do). He is going to cut taxes for EVERYONE, especially the middle class as much as he can.
You do think he is evil, but let me separate your statement...."just consider him UNABLE to be president." Hmmmm....we had someone in the White House who was totally incompetent and UNABLE to be president and unqualified for EIGHT YEARS. Obama. Trump lives in the REAL WORLD, knows how businesses work, and Trump is a THOUSAND TIMES more qualified than Obama could ever hope to be for the job. Trump's eight years will show everyone what a REAL and qualified individual can do as president.


Yes - he knows how business works - especially for his own benefit. And he still lives it - for his own benefit.
There is not everything lied about Trump - until now everything you called a lie turned out the truth.

Inauguration with less visitors as Obama a lie ?
Massacre in sweden a lie ?
Contacts to russia in december a lie ?

Am still waiting on the result of the eavesdrop affair - will it be the first thing Donny told the truth about ? I think no - but I already know your answer about it.
As it came from Breitbart it was the truth - all other news who denied it reported fakes about it.

Continue in living in your own colored bubbles with your own proofs pulled out of your very own ass - and you will have America being the Nazi-Deutschland.
They started same - censorship of news, declaring a religion as enemy (there it were jews - now we have the muslim) - denying unwanted facts and catching people with populism.
Doesn't remind that on America 2017 ?

Sex-spert you said:
Once again, YOU are clueless, Arch. The American VOTERS ARE the American PEOPLE. They are ONE and the SAME. They didn't go out and interview foreigners, they interviewed AMERICANS and it IS legitimate. You just refuse to believe it.
I pull nothing out of my ass like you do.

you obliviously do not understand set theory. American voters is a Sub set of American people. You are trying to take a sample of the sub set and apply it to the larger set, that is an invalid and deceiving way to use the results. I never said I believe it or not I simply said you are miss representing the data. (But you are to stupid to even under stand this).

As for you not pulling things out of your ass I have Proven you LIED over and over again (with links to the raw data). You have not proven anything I said was a lie. I only did this for one of your lies but if I cared enough could do for many more. But you have already wasted enough of my time. You have planted your head so for up Trumps (and yours) ass I am surprised you can pull anything out of your ass but yet you manage to.

I'm not stupid at all, Arch, you just think I am because you disagree with me on the issues. Certainly doesn't make me stupid. You obviously don't understand HOW polls work. EVERY poll is a set or section of Americans they interview. That poll was accurate but you refuse to believe it because you hate Trump so much. And YOU have wasted MY time. I have never lied about any subject.
Gee, they use polls of LIKELY VOTERS before EVERY ELECTION, it is done all the time. Those polls, especially if it's Rasmussen, are accurate.
Alb---he knows HOW to run a business. Obama never did. In fact, one of Obama's MANY lies was, "If you have a business, YOU did NOT BUILD IT. YOU did not make it." So he believes it was all magic?? It just appeared out of thin air and the businessmen had NOTHING to do with it. He is a one hundred percent socialist, and very arrogant.
Once again, Trump did not coordinate with the Russians to have them hack the election to cause him to win. Anyone who believes that is a fool. Also Trump's inauguration was one of the largest attendance ever. His supporters FAR outnumbered anyone who was "protesting" that day.
For you to compare the Trump administration to Nazism is fucking unbelievable. The two are OPPOSITES. Radical Muslim terrorists....Trump is calling a spade a spade. He's calling it what it IS, which is not what Obama did. Mainly because Obama IS a Muslim. Censorship of the news is CERTAINLY NOT what is going on. The media will continue to promote their lies and myths. The difference here from other Republican presidents is that Trump WILL call them out on it. And they hate that. They don't want their lies being challenged, they just want everyone to believe them.
Obama was certainly much closer to Nazism than Trump ever will be. And btw, Obama is exactly the kind of person who would have no problem wiretapping his political opponents or enemies. He WOULD do something like that. If it is discovered that he did, it would not shock or surprise me at all. He's a bastard.

Interesting that you are ignoring the main points and reason I wrote the link in the first place. It figures you would. FIFTY FIVE PERCENT of the American people are SICK AND TIRED of the liberal media's negative bullshit coverage of President Trump. You ignore that. The American people can see what's going on here, they can see how biased the media is and it turns them off. FIFTY FOUR PERCENT of Americans would say, correctly, that the media has assumed the role of the opposition party (Democrats), constantly opposing the president and his policies at EVERY TURN. They are correct. I'm sick and tired of their bullshit too. Even a majority of Independents (as I used to be) and moderates are sick and tired of the media's bullshit and bias. So as usual you are missing the point, Kert.
And the point of the article was that because the media is so biased, that is the reason WHY Trump's approval ratings can poll so low. It makes sense. If you hear bullshit lies and ONLY their point of view loudly over and over and over and over again, WTF do you think will happen? Some might start beginning to believe the lies because that's all they hear all day every day. If it weren't for the media's BS, I can assure you Trump's approval rating would be consistently 55 to 60 percent. That is the point of the article. I'm not contradicting myself at all. Trump is doing exactly what the American people elected him to do.
Interesting that you ignore the fact that of those enrolled in the Unaffordable Care Act, there has been a HUGE DROP IN SATISFACTION and support for the existing plans. Costs have gone UP not down, and I knew that would happen.
Forty two percent say Trump is providing strong leadership for the country, which is a greater number than those who said Obama was strong leadership.
Trump also has healthy majorities for his policies on securing the border and simplifying the tax code and building a wall. But you don't mention that.
Haven't you ever heard of the media twisting and misinterpreting what someone says? They do it ALL THE TIME. They will only play a very small part of a clip, and not finish the clip and what the person actually said. They will cut him mid sentence and twist what he said. OF COURSE the liberal media is going to do that with someone they hate. Trump is right when he said he's not buddy-buddy with Putin, and no one can prove that he is. Trump is RIGHT when he said there was no communication and no deal struck with the Russians. It is a LIE the liberals made up because they are very angry they lost the election and they want a scapegoat.
But what I said about the network is the truth. George S. WAS a part of the Clinton administration for eight years, then after his work in the administration, he went onto biased reporting for the liberal media.
Wrong Suggs. I was talking specifically to Derek because I am the ONLY writer in the thread that he bitches and complains about. He doesn't tell anyone else to shut up, only me. So my response to him is, you are only saying these things to me because you disagree with me on the issues discussed here. It's a logical conclusion.
I didn't smack myself in the head at all. Like I said, one of the main points of the article is that if it weren't for the obvious bias of the media, Trump's approval rating would be much higher, probably 60 percent. Everyone DOES agree with what Trump is trying to do, and when he is successful, our country will be much better off.



I ignore nothing, I think you are the one with your head in the sand. Of corse the media appears biased, Thump through his dumbass tweets and comments is the perfect target, the media has always attacked politicians that lie and make alternative facts, the FACT is Thump is the worst of the lot. Funny thing about you people is that when a poll shows negative its bullshit or fake, the minute it shows positive its correct and a "beautiful thing".

If you want to prove that the media twisted what was said then do yourself a favour and post the entire interview to make your point, otherwise we can only assume its bullshit like your Clinton giving away uranium and Obama giving the Russians permission to build as many nukes as they like statements. You see when you make up shit, like your mighty leader does, it gets difficult to know the crap from the truth, although with the two of you I think we can assume its crap up front.

Lets see the outcome of the Russian connection enquiry and the wire tapping fiasco before we make any conclusions, although when exchanging gifts one would have thought they were getting on just fine.

"Everyone DOES agree with what Trump is trying to do, and when he is successful, our country will be much better off." More bullshit, EVERYONE does not agree, the polls show that, the rubbish polls from your own source.

As for the thoughts on Thumps temperament being suitable for a president, heres a poll you may not enjoy:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/opinion/trump-and-the-parasitic-presidency.html?_r=0
carried out by Suffolk University of a sample of 1000 registered voters.

The sad thing about you is you actually believe 'EVERYONE' is as gullible as you and that 'ALL' your fellow Americans are lapping up Trumps lies ... I give your people a lot more credit for intelligence than you do.

sex-spert you said "I'm not stupid at all, Arch, you just think I am because you disagree with me on the issues. Certainly doesn't make me stupid." No I do not think you are stupid because I do not agree with you, I know you are stupid because you are, in fact, stupid. To show how stupid you are you then said "You obviously don't understand HOW polls work. EVERY poll is a set or section of Americans they interview. That poll was accurate but you refuse to believe it because you hate Trump so much."
First of all this is a very stupid and ethnocentric comment (look it up yourself but hint there are polls in other countries) Second point I never said I did not say the poll was inaccurate, I do not like some of the methods the polling firm used, but I would say it could be an accurate poll for American Voters, but it is NOT accurate for a poll of American Citizens.

But I guess I have to show you why you are miss quoting the poll data and show you, that you have no clue how polls work. So lets say I take a poll (similar to this one) and poll American people, I then take those results and throw out data the do not match the demographic I want (say democrats, republicans, female, voters, persons shoe size, it does not matter what the sub set but that it is a sub set) for this example lets say I pick democrats). So I scrub the data to remove any opinions of people who do not fit my demographic, now I can say my poll of democrats they have a (low) opinion of Trump and a (high) disapproval rate of Trump. (where low and high are my statistical analysis numbers from the poll).

This is a very valid use of the data. But what you do (and I have been trying to tell you) is you are taking that sub set of data and applying it back to the whole group again. That is an invalid interpretation of the data set.

So what I have been trying to tell you is you cannot apply a poll of a sub set back to the larger set that is an invalid use of how polls work. Your repeated miss use of this proves (PROVES) you are stupid. You even back up your stupidity by saying: "Gee, they use polls of LIKELY VOTERS before EVERY ELECTION, it is done all the time." And when they present the data they say it is a poll of (sub group) be it voters, likely voters, registered voters they do not then try and change the sample set to say ALL Americans like you do.

Then you said "I have never lied about any subject." Need I repeat my self to prove you lied you said: "" You're gonna tell me my statement that the GOP only had total control of the government TWICE since the 1920s, and the second time just recently? You can't tell me that because you know it's the truth." I have given you the data this year is the FORTH time the GOP has controlled both houses and the white house. (I know you read the post because you keep trying to prove you were technically right.) Then you said You going to refute the truth? There's nothing I said that was NOT true" This is a lie as you can see your comment about the GOP control is not true. More Sex-spert lies.

Really you are actually doing a disservice to your cause because you do not know how to present an argument and validate your point. You had a point you were trying to use the above lie to support but because you chose a lie to support it severely weakens your point, especially as it was the only thing you tried to use to support it. If your point is valid there are many ways you could present data to support it. (hint three branches House, Senate, WhiteHouse, Two parties that control each (D and R) you could do a chart showing how may years were under each combination of government)
D D D = x years
D D R = x years
...
R R R = x years
Because you do not understand how to present your argument it weakens your argument, and hurts your cause.

Next point that shows you are to dumb to read a map. You said that the keystone pipeline (which goes from Canada to the US) would help America from being dependent on foreign oil. (you never did say how increasing American foreign oil imports would decrease American dependence on foreign oil).

Yet another point to show you are stupid and do not under stand how the senate works you claimed that the republicans did not control the senate because it was split 47R-47D. (the sitting vice president was a Republican in the case you were siting so that senate would be considered under Republican control, because the Vice President gets the deciding vote in case of ties so a party line vote would be 48R - 47D) Yet again you show you do NOT understand.

You really are just to stupid to argue with you just do not understand the facts and you lack an understanding on how to present an argument in an inelegant way to try and support your case. You have claimed falsehoods to be true so you have no credibility and you do more harm to your cause then you do good.

enough said

Ok Arch I can pull the same shit you're trying to pull. I will declare you are STUPID and it makes it a fact just because I am saying it. So, you're stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid. And again, you're stupid. It makes it official. You're truly an idiot.
I am in fact an excellent debater and have won arguments in many debates before. In one debate session, all of my opponents were confounded to complete silence. They didn't know what to say because I shot down their arguments so effectively and resoundingly. The next time the debate group was to get together, the ONLY one who showed up for another session was me. My opponents did not want to show up if I was going to be there because they didn't want to face me in debate. I was smiling. So take that and shove it up where the sun don't shine.
I was telling the TRUTH when I was talking about how long the Democrats had control, vs how long the Republicans had complete control, but you refuse to listen to me. I have to repeat myself AGAIN. The Democrats had at least 22 YEARS of total control of the government since the 30s. Republicans have had only a grand total of SIX. I repeat, SIX. Which number is greater, you moron? Knowing you, you would probably say six is greater. If you add 2017 and 2018, that makes the total GOP control only EIGHT years. The Democrats have enjoyed total control for a LOT LONGER than the GOP ever did, and that's the point I was making that you aren't smart enough to understand. Another specific example I will give is Republican Congressman Robert Mitchel who died recently. In all the time he served in the US House (1957 to 1995) he NEVER served during a time that the GOP had TOTAL government control. That proves my point as well.
American voters ARE also American citizens, and American citizens ARE American voters. My point (which you're not smart enough to understand) was that if it weren't for the news media and their BS, Trump's approval rating would be consistently high, not low.
The vast majority DO agree with what Trump is trying to do, Kert, you just disagree with it. And the NYT is not the paper of record anymore, it is just opinion piece after opinion piece. You know exactly where their bias is. BTW, TWO college professors (both of whom voted for Obama) have publicly stated that Obama DOES NOT HAVE THE TEMPERAMENT FOR THE WHITE HOUSE and never did. While they supported him, they are also admitting he NEVER had the temperament for the Oval Office. They are right on that. But it makes me wonder, since they KNEW that was true all along, WHY THE FUCK did they VOTE for the unqualified asshole in the first place??? The only thing I can think of is, it was because he is black and they didn't want anyone to think they were racists by not supporting a black guy. It must have been a racial thing.
So, I don't think you are stupid Arch. I KNOW you are stupid. Good day.

Ok Arch I can pull the same shit you're trying to pull. I will declare you are STUPID and it makes it a fact just because I am saying it. So, you're stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid. And again, you're stupid. It makes it official. You're truly an idiot.
I am in fact an excellent debater and have won arguments in many debates before. In one debate session, all of my opponents were confounded to complete silence. They didn't know what to say because I shot down their arguments so effectively and resoundingly. The next time the debate group was to get together, the ONLY one who showed up for another session was me. My opponents did not want to show up if I was going to be there because they didn't want to face me in debate. I was smiling. So take that and shove it up where the sun don't shine.
I was telling the TRUTH when I was talking about how long the Democrats had control, vs how long the Republicans had complete control, but you refuse to listen to me. I have to repeat myself AGAIN. The Democrats had at least 22 YEARS of total control of the government since the 30s. Republicans have had only a grand total of SIX. I repeat, SIX. Which number is greater, you moron? Knowing you, you would probably say six is greater. If you add 2017 and 2018, that makes the total GOP control only EIGHT years. The Democrats have enjoyed total control for a LOT LONGER than the GOP ever did, and that's the point I was making that you aren't smart enough to understand. Another specific example I will give is Republican Congressman Robert Mitchel who died recently. In all the time he served in the US House (1957 to 1995) he NEVER served during a time that the GOP had TOTAL government control. That proves my point as well.
American voters ARE also American citizens, and American citizens ARE American voters. My point (which you're not smart enough to understand) was that if it weren't for the news media and their BS, Trump's approval rating would be consistently high, not low.
The vast majority DO agree with what Trump is trying to do, Kert, you just disagree with it. And the NYT is not the paper of record anymore, it is just opinion piece after opinion piece. You know exactly where their bias is. BTW, TWO college professors (both of whom voted for Obama) have publicly stated that Obama DOES NOT HAVE THE TEMPERAMENT FOR THE WHITE HOUSE and never did. While they supported him, they are also admitting he NEVER had the temperament for the Oval Office. They are right on that. But it makes me wonder, since they KNEW that was true all along, WHY THE FUCK did they VOTE for the unqualified asshole in the first place??? The only thing I can think of is, it was because he is black and they didn't want anyone to think they were racists by not supporting a black guy. It must have been a racial thing.
So, I don't think you are stupid Arch. I KNOW you are stupid. Good day.


LOL you won a debate!!! too funny! Was it in a dementia ward or some prison cell?

Typical of your comments EVERYONE now changes to VAST MAJORITY, which by all accounts is untrue any way.

What is this 'OPINION PIECE' bullshit? They (NYT) back their claims up with demonstrable proof, you are the master of opinion, you quote no fact just your own warped take on reality. For example two college professors ... do they have names, was their opinion published, why was their opinion worth a pinch of shit? Quote us your meaningful source for this trivial bit of information, or is it another of your bullshit stories ...like the Clinton giving away uranium and Obama authorising the Russians to build unlimited nukes ... total RUBBISH, FAKE NEWS! Thats all you have me thinks. BTW looks like that new Healthcare Plan is a pile of shit too, and Trump is breaking his promises ... predictable ... nooooo just biased media I hear you say .... no its FACT! The big winners.. guess who? THE RICH!
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-s-backing-healthcare-plan-breaks-his-promis es-n733031
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/13/politics/cbo-democrats-beat-trump-obamacare/

You also should be careful not to let your racist thoughts enter the debate ... it will make it even easier to shoot you down. No one enjoys hunting a totally dead duck (no fun at all)!

Ok Arch I can pull the same shit you're trying to pull. I will declare you are STUPID and it makes it a fact just because I am saying it. So, you're stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid. And again, you're stupid. It makes it official. You're truly an idiot.
I am in fact an excellent debater and have won arguments in many debates before. In one debate session, all of my opponents were confounded to complete silence. They didn't know what to say because I shot down their arguments so effectively and resoundingly. The next time the debate group was to get together, the ONLY one who showed up for another session was me. My opponents did not want to show up if I was going to be there because they didn't want to face me in debate. I was smiling. So take that and shove it up where the sun don't shine.
I was telling the TRUTH when I was talking about how long the Democrats had control, vs how long the Republicans had complete control, but you refuse to listen to me. I have to repeat myself AGAIN. The Democrats had at least 22 YEARS of total control of the government since the 30s. Republicans have had only a grand total of SIX. I repeat, SIX. Which number is greater, you moron? Knowing you, you would probably say six is greater. If you add 2017 and 2018, that makes the total GOP control only EIGHT years. The Democrats have enjoyed total control for a LOT LONGER than the GOP ever did, and that's the point I was making that you aren't smart enough to understand. Another specific example I will give is Republican Congressman Robert Mitchel who died recently. In all the time he served in the US House (1957 to 1995) he NEVER served during a time that the GOP had TOTAL government control. That proves my point as well.
American voters ARE also American citizens, and American citizens ARE American voters. My point (which you're not smart enough to understand) was that if it weren't for the news media and their BS, Trump's approval rating would be consistently high, not low.
The vast majority DO agree with what Trump is trying to do, Kert, you just disagree with it. And the NYT is not the paper of record anymore, it is just opinion piece after opinion piece. You know exactly where their bias is. BTW, TWO college professors (both of whom voted for Obama) have publicly stated that Obama DOES NOT HAVE THE TEMPERAMENT FOR THE WHITE HOUSE and never did. While they supported him, they are also admitting he NEVER had the temperament for the Oval Office. They are right on that. But it makes me wonder, since they KNEW that was true all along, WHY THE FUCK did they VOTE for the unqualified asshole in the first place??? The only thing I can think of is, it was because he is black and they didn't want anyone to think they were racists by not supporting a black guy. It must have been a racial thing.
So, I don't think you are stupid Arch. I KNOW you are stupid. Good day.


I summarize Squirts newest essay: bla bla bla - he still didn't get the difference between fact and assertion.

Alb you're just bla bla bla, no substance as usual.
Kert you bludger, you galoot, I DID win debates, I'm not just making this story up. I was there, YOU WEREN'T. Everyone had to admit I won the debates, end of story. And I've NEVER been in a prison cell, DUH.
Trump is KEEPING his promises, not breaking them, and he will continue to keep them. Repealing and replacing ACA is exactly what he is doing as we speak. Are you too blind to see that? He said he COULD let it implode on its own, but that would be the wrong thing to do and all of America would suffer if he did that. It would be immoral. So he is fixing it and keeping his word.
It was a network news station I was watching that had the story about the professors shortly after the 2012 elections. I didn't WRITE DOWN the university name or the professor's names, but just because I didn't write it down doesn't mean I am LYING about the story. I saw the report with my own TWO eyes, heard it with my own two ears, and I'm NOT making this up either. You just don't want to believe the professors said that because it doesn't fit your world view.
I have found it doesn't matter how many links I post or how often I post them. You and others automatically say the links are a bunch of BS and lies and you discount them automatically. EVERY TIME. So what then would be the point of me posting more links, since you react that way and always discount them?? I'm wasting my time.
And here we go again, the bullshit and idiotic charges of RACISM that the liberals always scream about even though they know that's a lie. There is NOTHING RACIST IN ANYTHING I HAVE SAID. It is a FACT that there are a number of voters out there who voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012 JUST BECAUSE HE HAPPENS TO BE BLACK. Just because of his race, they voted for him, which is NOT a legitimate reason to vote for anyone. He could be black, and also CORRUPT. He could be black, and a CRIMINAL. That's the stupidest reason to vote for anyone, whether they are Democrat or Republican. Their qualifications and philosophy are reasons to vote for or against them, NOT THE COLOR OF THEIR DAMN SKIN.
I remember a black female voter from Louisiana who was interviewed on the radio shortly before the 2012 election. She was right on the money. This BLACK female said, "The most racist thing of ALL is to tell someone they are racist just because they never voted for Obama. They scream, 'You don't support or vote for Obama, you're obviously a racist who hates black people.' That attitude itself is RACIST!!!" She was exactly right. But I'm sure you think that that woman is a racist who hates black people because she never voted for Obama, even though she herself is black. UnbeFUCKINGlievable. WOW

Alb you're just bla bla bla, no substance as usual.
Kert you bludger, you galoot, I DID win debates, I'm not just making this story up. I was there, YOU WEREN'T. Everyone had to admit I won the debates, end of story. And I've NEVER been in a prison cell, DUH.
Trump is KEEPING his promises, not breaking them, and he will continue to keep them. Repealing and replacing ACA is exactly what he is doing as we speak. Are you too blind to see that? He said he COULD let it implode on its own, but that would be the wrong thing to do and all of America would suffer if he did that. It would be immoral. So he is fixing it and keeping his word.
It was a network news station I was watching that had the story about the professors shortly after the 2012 elections. I didn't WRITE DOWN the university name or the professor's names, but just because I didn't write it down doesn't mean I am LYING about the story. I saw the report with my own TWO eyes, heard it with my own two ears, and I'm NOT making this up either. You just don't want to believe the professors said that because it doesn't fit your world view.
I have found it doesn't matter how many links I post or how often I post them. You and others automatically say the links are a bunch of BS and lies and you discount them automatically. EVERY TIME. So what then would be the point of me posting more links, since you react that way and always discount them?? I'm wasting my time.
And here we go again, the bullshit and idiotic charges of RACISM that the liberals always scream about even though they know that's a lie. There is NOTHING RACIST IN ANYTHING I HAVE SAID. It is a FACT that there are a number of voters out there who voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012 JUST BECAUSE HE HAPPENS TO BE BLACK. Just because of his race, they voted for him, which is NOT a legitimate reason to vote for anyone. He could be black, and also CORRUPT. He could be black, and a CRIMINAL. That's the stupidest reason to vote for anyone, whether they are Democrat or Republican. Their qualifications and philosophy are reasons to vote for or against them, NOT THE COLOR OF THEIR DAMN SKIN.
I remember a black female voter from Louisiana who was interviewed on the radio shortly before the 2012 election. She was right on the money. This BLACK female said, "The most racist thing of ALL is to tell someone they are racist just because they never voted for Obama. They scream, 'You don't support or vote for Obama, you're obviously a racist who hates black people.' That attitude itself is RACIST!!!" She was exactly right. But I'm sure you think that that woman is a racist who hates black people because she never voted for Obama, even though she herself is black. UnbeFUCKINGlievable. WOW



OK so it was a dementia ward then.

Herein lies the problem Squirt, you see we are not sure that we can rely on your eyes and ears, it seems that they have in many instances let you down. (as with your translation of the Clinton selling Uranium and Obama giving the Russians permission to build as many nukes as they like). You can’t now blame us for wanting evidence to back up your claims, since when we put them to the test they fail miserably. You have no links, if you did you would post it, you simply want to slither around the fact that you have nothing.

The point has always been that, YES you need secure borders, you need a great Health Care Act, you need security, you need tax reform, you need a healthy environment … the PROBLEM is in order to have these you need intelligent change that will improve them, unfortunately you have an absolute idiot that is driven by ego and self gratification steering your ship … YES he will change everything at the expense of the American people, the Global population and the Environment, and you and those like you will applaud all the way over the cliff edge. There is evidence already that things are starting to go off track, your NEW Health Care Act will be the first.

Congrats on the name calling … ‘A’ for effort … best content you’ve contributed on this thread!

OK sex-spert (OH I heard your real name is Richard Cranium can I just call you RC for short?, of course I think it was me who called you that.) OK RC so you are a Master Debater (that is very popular on this site). but lets get down to facts and not alternative (love that link) facts.

you have said in this forum: (shit forgot I would have to read his post to do this damn.)
On March 13th: you said "I have never lied about any subject." (this is a lie but lets get to the facts)

on Feb 16th: you said "You're gonna tell me my statement that the GOP only had total control of the government TWICE since the 1920s, and the second time just recently? You can't tell me that because you know it's the truth."
Now to be clear this sentence is what I am talking about I do not care how many years the Democrats controlled vs the Republicans. You said the above sentence was TRUE it is not (see my post on Feb 16th for my first proof it was false, and again later on Feb 16th gave you a second proof it was FALSE.

On Feb 19th: you said "The Democrats had control of Congress during the Eisenhower administration" This was disproved with both of my proofs I posted on Feb 16th. The Republicans controlled the house and the senate in the 83rd congress during the Eisenhower administration.

on Feb 16th: you said "technically I was correct about the 50s as well, since the Senate split was 47 Republicans and 47 Democrats." This is also a lie as you are talking about a time when the Republicans controlled the vice presidency which it the tie breaking vote. (it is also not true as that condition (well it was 47R - 47D - 1I with the Independent voting with the Republicans) did not happen until the last few days of the session before that the Republicans had the majority with sitting senators).

So you did not lie then oh Master Debater Prove your three sentences above are true.
I am sure I could do this for most of what you said but here are 3 clear cut cases where you flat out lied and you are just to stupid to understand that. I expect your next post will be you crying about you are TECHNICALLY CORRECT because of some fact you pulled out of your diapers but if you are correct and can prove you point PROVE the these three sentences you said are true are true. Tell you what IF you PROVE all three of your comments above are true then I will send you a $25 gift card. To remind you they are:

"You're gonna tell me my statement that the GOP only had total control of the government TWICE since the 1920s, and the second time just recently? You can't tell me that because you know it's the truth." (As you said this in February that would include the current government)

"The Democrats had control of Congress during the Eisenhower administration"

"technically I was correct about the 50s as well, since the Senate split was 47 Republicans and 47 Democrats." (this one you have to prove the republicans did not control the senate while split 47-47 with a sitting vice president is a Republican.

I even have a way to get you the gift card number I will give it to a model I trust (and actually could not use it anyway as they are only good in the US) and she will e-mail the number to you. So stand behind your words and you will also get $25. Otherwise STFU.

No, YOU STFU arch because I'm not going to. I won't shut up about the truth.
It was NOT a dementia ward you chunder shit for brains. I won the debates whether you want to believe it or not is irrelevant. It happened. Things are NOT going off track already, you just want them to because you hate Trump so much. Well, he is going to succeed anyway, so that's tough shit for you. you are right, we DO need all those things you mentioned, and Trump's going to give us those and fulfill his promises. The only one who was an idiot driven by EGO and arrogance was Obama, not our current president. How could you NOT see that with Obama??? It was obvious.
As far as the Democrats coordinating with Russia, they have been doing that consistently since at least the 1980s. And you know it. The USSR was the Democrat's best friend and ally. They HATED Reagan's stance against communism because they support communism (still do) and they LOVED Gorbechev. They were ALWAYS on the side of the USSR. To give a more recent example, there is a fat Russian ambassador who is spending ALL of his time with....the DEMOCRATS. This individual was in the audience during Trump's State of the Union Address, and he was sitting with the Democrats on the DEMOCRAT'S side of the aisle, not the Republicans. He is always with the Democrats. That should tell you right there that the Russians are in cahoots with the Democrat Party, NOT the GOP. Hell, he could be part of the Democrat's efforts to spread the rumor that the Trump camp was working with the Russians to make sure Hillary lost the election. Once again, I will say that if anyone is really close to and buddies with the Russians, it is the Democrats and always has been.
The new health care law WILL pass, and if the Democrats don't vote for it also, they WILL lose at least 8 seats in the Senate next year. That I can assure you, as everyone wants the ACA repealed and replaced by a free market system.
Now to address the lies of arch. When I said the Democrats controlled Congress during the Eisenhower administration that was the TRUTH. They DID. It was NOT A LIE. You didn't even address the truth when I pointed out that Bob Mitchel was NEVER the MAJORITY LEADER in all his time he was in the House. The GOP NEVER had control of all of the government for that entire time. That goes to prove my point which you ignore. Eisenhower was so tired of always having to deal with a DEMOCRAT Congress that he spent most of his time golfing. At least that was more enjoyable than having to deal with the legislative liberals constantly.
So, when you say YOU DON'T CARE about the amount of time Democrats had control vs Republicans, what you are saying is that you don't care about the TRUTH. That is obvious and evident. You need to go back to school and study simple math a bit more. Counting this year and next, the GOP only had total control for 8 years, whereas the Dems had control for 22. But you're not smart enough to grasp that concept. The POINT IS, the Democrats have NOTHING TO FUCKING complain about, since they have had total control for so long, and they whine and bitch and complain if they don't have total control even for TWO YEARS. They are spoiled ch1ldren who never grow up.
I notice i totally shot down your accusation that I'm racist, since you didn't even address that subject in your last post, Kert.
I bet you are lying (as you lie about everything else and twist my words) when you say you have a $25 gift card for me. Yeah right. What is it, $25 worth in credits on this site? $25 for Hometown Buffet, which doesn't even exist anymore??
You ignore the points I am making in my posts, you go off on tangents on things that don't matter to avoid the truth of what I am saying, you ignore my links. You're just going to believe what you're going to believe no matter what.
Trump is going to fulfill all of his promises, he has already started doing it, things are already improving because of what he's done since inauguration, and that's just the way it is. Nothing you can do about that.

No, YOU STFU arch because I'm not going to. I won't shut up about the truth.
It was NOT a dementia ward you chunder shit for brains. I won the debates whether you want to believe it or not is irrelevant. It happened. Things are NOT going off track already, you just want them to because you hate Trump so much. Well, he is going to succeed anyway, so that's tough shit for you. you are right, we DO need all those things you mentioned, and Trump's going to give us those and fulfill his promises. The only one who was an idiot driven by EGO and arrogance was Obama, not our current president. How could you NOT see that with Obama??? It was obvious.
As far as the Democrats coordinating with Russia, they have been doing that consistently since at least the 1980s. And you know it. The USSR was the Democrat's best friend and ally. They HATED Reagan's stance against communism because they support communism (still do) and they LOVED Gorbechev. They were ALWAYS on the side of the USSR. To give a more recent example, there is a fat Russian ambassador who is spending ALL of his time with....the DEMOCRATS. This individual was in the audience during Trump's State of the Union Address, and he was sitting with the Democrats on the DEMOCRAT'S side of the aisle, not the Republicans. He is always with the Democrats. That should tell you right there that the Russians are in cahoots with the Democrat Party, NOT the GOP. Hell, he could be part of the Democrat's efforts to spread the rumor that the Trump camp was working with the Russians to make sure Hillary lost the election. Once again, I will say that if anyone is really close to and buddies with the Russians, it is the Democrats and always has been.
The new health care law WILL pass, and if the Democrats don't vote for it also, they WILL lose at least 8 seats in the Senate next year. That I can assure you, as everyone wants the ACA repealed and replaced by a free market system.
Now to address the lies of arch. When I said the Democrats controlled Congress during the Eisenhower administration that was the TRUTH. They DID. It was NOT A LIE. You didn't even address the truth when I pointed out that Bob Mitchel was NEVER the MAJORITY LEADER in all his time he was in the House. The GOP NEVER had control of all of the government for that entire time. That goes to prove my point which you ignore. Eisenhower was so tired of always having to deal with a DEMOCRAT Congress that he spent most of his time golfing. At least that was more enjoyable than having to deal with the legislative liberals constantly.
So, when you say YOU DON'T CARE about the amount of time Democrats had control vs Republicans, what you are saying is that you don't care about the TRUTH. That is obvious and evident. You need to go back to school and study simple math a bit more. Counting this year and next, the GOP only had total control for 8 years, whereas the Dems had control for 22. But you're not smart enough to grasp that concept. The POINT IS, the Democrats have NOTHING TO FUCKING complain about, since they have had total control for so long, and they whine and bitch and complain if they don't have total control even for TWO YEARS. They are spoiled ch1ldren who never grow up.
I notice i totally shot down your accusation that I'm racist, since you didn't even address that subject in your last post, Kert.
I bet you are lying (as you lie about everything else and twist my words) when you say you have a $25 gift card for me. Yeah right. What is it, $25 worth in credits on this site? $25 for Hometown Buffet, which doesn't even exist anymore??
You ignore the points I am making in my posts, you go off on tangents on things that don't matter to avoid the truth of what I am saying, you ignore my links. You're just going to believe what you're going to believe no matter what.
Trump is going to fulfill all of his promises, he has already started doing it, things are already improving because of what he's done since inauguration, and that's just the way it is. Nothing you can do about that.

No, YOU STFU arch because I'm not going to. I won't shut up about the truth.
It was NOT a dementia ward you chunder shit for brains. I won the debates whether you want to believe it or not is irrelevant. It happened. Things are NOT going off track already, you just want them to because you hate Trump so much. Well, he is going to succeed anyway, so that's tough shit for you. you are right, we DO need all those things you mentioned, and Trump's going to give us those and fulfill his promises. The only one who was an idiot driven by EGO and arrogance was Obama, not our current president. How could you NOT see that with Obama??? It was obvious.
As far as the Democrats coordinating with Russia, they have been doing that consistently since at least the 1980s. And you know it. The USSR was the Democrat's best friend and ally. They HATED Reagan's stance against communism because they support communism (still do) and they LOVED Gorbechev. They were ALWAYS on the side of the USSR. To give a more recent example, there is a fat Russian ambassador who is spending ALL of his time with....the DEMOCRATS. This individual was in the audience during Trump's State of the Union Address, and he was sitting with the Democrats on the DEMOCRAT'S side of the aisle, not the Republicans. He is always with the Democrats. That should tell you right there that the Russians are in cahoots with the Democrat Party, NOT the GOP. Hell, he could be part of the Democrat's efforts to spread the rumor that the Trump camp was working with the Russians to make sure Hillary lost the election. Once again, I will say that if anyone is really close to and buddies with the Russians, it is the Democrats and always has been.
The new health care law WILL pass, and if the Democrats don't vote for it also, they WILL lose at least 8 seats in the Senate next year. That I can assure you, as everyone wants the ACA repealed and replaced by a free market system.
Now to address the lies of arch. When I said the Democrats controlled Congress during the Eisenhower administration that was the TRUTH. They DID. It was NOT A LIE. You didn't even address the truth when I pointed out that Bob Mitchel was NEVER the MAJORITY LEADER in all his time he was in the House. The GOP NEVER had control of all of the government for that entire time. That goes to prove my point which you ignore. Eisenhower was so tired of always having to deal with a DEMOCRAT Congress that he spent most of his time golfing. At least that was more enjoyable than having to deal with the legislative liberals constantly.
So, when you say YOU DON'T CARE about the amount of time Democrats had control vs Republicans, what you are saying is that you don't care about the TRUTH. That is obvious and evident. You need to go back to school and study simple math a bit more. Counting this year and next, the GOP only had total control for 8 years, whereas the Dems had control for 22. But you're not smart enough to grasp that concept. The POINT IS, the Democrats have NOTHING TO FUCKING complain about, since they have had total control for so long, and they whine and bitch and complain if they don't have total control even for TWO YEARS. They are spoiled ch1ldren who never grow up.
I notice i totally shot down your accusation that I'm racist, since you didn't even address that subject in your last post, Kert.
I bet you are lying (as you lie about everything else and twist my words) when you say you have a $25 gift card for me. Yeah right. What is it, $25 worth in credits on this site? $25 for Hometown Buffet, which doesn't even exist anymore??
You ignore the points I am making in my posts, you go off on tangents on things that don't matter to avoid the truth of what I am saying, you ignore my links. You're just going to believe what you're going to believe no matter what.
Trump is going to fulfill all of his promises, he has already started doing it, things are already improving because of what he's done since inauguration, and that's just the way it is. Nothing you can do about that.



As I have no SOLID evidence and only a sneaking suspicion that you are a racist, I think it is pointless pursuing (until I can provide PROOF), unlike you I feel I can only argue a point based on a foundation of indisputable evidence. So for the meantime i give you the benefit of the doubt, but I for one still has doubt.

You on the other hand are no different to Thump and his stupid claims of wire tapping, just spews out rubbish in order to detract from the truth.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-wiretap-claim-obama-comey-congress.html

I have read every link you have posted, probably better than you have as pointed out in the last link you referred us to. So don't try that excuse, the fact is you have no links and nothing to back up your flimsy ramblings.

"chunder shit for brains" ... LOL EXCELLENT!! you getting a grasp of the Aussie vernacular for sure!

Four men were bragging about how smart their cats are. The first man was an Engineer, the second man was an Accountant, the third man was a Chemist, the fourth was a Government Worker.

To show off, the Engineer called to his cat. "T-square, do your stuff." T-square pranced over to a desk, took out some paper and a pen and promptly drew a circle, a square, and a triangle.

Everyone agreed that was pretty smart. But the Accountant said his cat could do better. He called his cat and said, "Spreadsheet, do your stuff." Spreadsheet went out into the kitchen and returned with a dozen cookies. He divided them into 4 equal piles of 3 cookies each. Everyone agreed that was good.

But the Chemist said his cat could do better. He called his cat and said, "Measure, do your stuff." Measure got up, walked over to the fridge, took out a quart of milk, got a 10 ounce glass from the cupboard and poured exactly 8 ounces without spilling a drop. Everyone agreed that was good.

Then the three men turned to the Government Worker and said, "What can your cat do?" The Government Worker called to his cat and said, "Coffee Break, do your stuff." Coffee Break jumped to his feet, ate the cookies, drank the milk, peed on the paper, assaulted the other three cats, claimed he injured his back while doing so, filed a grievance report for unsafe working conditions, put in for Workers Compensation and went home for the rest of the day on sick leave.
Doesn`t Coffee Break resemble someone familiar?!

So RC (i.e. Sex-spert) as your post does not prove the comments you made are true then I take it you unable to prove them. No I did not twist your words I quoted them verbatim and included the date you posted them (in this thread) so anyone can go back and look at them to validate I quoted them correctly. I do not go off on tangents I quoted your FACTS you are the one who keeps avoiding backing them up by going off on a tangent. The gift card will be a $25 Visa gift card you can use anywhere in the US. (Well I cannot get you the physical card but will give you all the information card # dates and what ever, then I will destroy it so it cannot be used before you get it) I am not lying I will send it IF and only IF you can PROVE YOUR "truthful" comments are true. I say the one's I listed are false (and so do the facts). So I have put up with you and went to the trouble to disprove your "FACTS" so now defend them, in other words put up or shut up. It is up to you now if you are correct prove it. But YOU cannot prove your FACTS because they are false and by not responding to them you just keep on showing you earned the name Richard Cranium.

Who want to bet me that Sex-sperts next post will not even address the validity of his three FACTS. but will go off on a tangent and (as alb so eloquently put it) say NO YOU shut up Arch...blablabla...Obama...blablabla...I"M RIGHT...blablabla...

No, YOU STFU arch because I'm not going to. I won't shut up about the truth.
It was NOT a dementia ward you chunder shit for brains. I won the debates whether you want to believe it or not is irrelevant. It happened. Things are NOT going off track already, you just want them to because you hate Trump so much. Well, he is going to succeed anyway, so that's tough shit for you. you are right, we DO need all those things you mentioned, and Trump's going to give us those and fulfill his promises. The only one who was an idiot driven by EGO and arrogance was Obama, not our current president. How could you NOT see that with Obama??? It was obvious.
As far as the Democrats coordinating with Russia, they have been doing that consistently since at least the 1980s. And you know it. The USSR was the Democrat's best friend and ally. They HATED Reagan's stance against communism because they support communism (still do) and they LOVED Gorbechev. They were ALWAYS on the side of the USSR. To give a more recent example, there is a fat Russian ambassador who is spending ALL of his time with....the DEMOCRATS. This individual was in the audience during Trump's State of the Union Address, and he was sitting with the Democrats on the DEMOCRAT'S side of the aisle, not the Republicans. He is always with the Democrats. That should tell you right there that the Russians are in cahoots with the Democrat Party, NOT the GOP. Hell, he could be part of the Democrat's efforts to spread the rumor that the Trump camp was working with the Russians to make sure Hillary lost the election. Once again, I will say that if anyone is really close to and buddies with the Russians, it is the Democrats and always has been.
The new health care law WILL pass, and if the Democrats don't vote for it also, they WILL lose at least 8 seats in the Senate next year. That I can assure you, as everyone wants the ACA repealed and replaced by a free market system.
Now to address the lies of arch. When I said the Democrats controlled Congress during the Eisenhower administration that was the TRUTH. They DID. It was NOT A LIE. You didn't even address the truth when I pointed out that Bob Mitchel was NEVER the MAJORITY LEADER in all his time he was in the House. The GOP NEVER had control of all of the government for that entire time. That goes to prove my point which you ignore. Eisenhower was so tired of always having to deal with a DEMOCRAT Congress that he spent most of his time golfing. At least that was more enjoyable than having to deal with the legislative liberals constantly.
So, when you say YOU DON'T CARE about the amount of time Democrats had control vs Republicans, what you are saying is that you don't care about the TRUTH. That is obvious and evident. You need to go back to school and study simple math a bit more. Counting this year and next, the GOP only had total control for 8 years, whereas the Dems had control for 22. But you're not smart enough to grasp that concept. The POINT IS, the Democrats have NOTHING TO FUCKING complain about, since they have had total control for so long, and they whine and bitch and complain if they don't have total control even for TWO YEARS. They are spoiled ch1ldren who never grow up.
I notice i totally shot down your accusation that I'm racist, since you didn't even address that subject in your last post, Kert.
I bet you are lying (as you lie about everything else and twist my words) when you say you have a $25 gift card for me. Yeah right. What is it, $25 worth in credits on this site? $25 for Hometown Buffet, which doesn't even exist anymore??
You ignore the points I am making in my posts, you go off on tangents on things that don't matter to avoid the truth of what I am saying, you ignore my links. You're just going to believe what you're going to believe no matter what.
Trump is going to fulfill all of his promises, he has already started doing it, things are already improving because of what he's done since inauguration, and that's just the way it is. Nothing you can do about that.



You still sound like a lil k1d whose teddybear got taken away - angry that nobody plays with you, because you are that wannabe that want to control everybodies thoughts.
Am sure you didn't win the debates - they only gave up because they got bored by your constant weeping.
Until now you present your (or others assumptions) as truth - you never ever presented a single fact.
An assertion of someone else doesn't make it a fact.
Present us facts why Trump should be the man you wish he his - and most important stop boring us with your hate about Democrats Thump is the topic.
Reps are responsible for USA politics - and I didn't see any improvement in their first actions.
Trump care didn't go thru so far as it will lead to more than 14 million of AMERICANS without health insureance in next years (that would be according to Trumps unemployment counting around 180 million of citizens - you can take the 180 million as a fact - as I did it your way - and pulled them right of my ass as I dreamt about that figure or I read that on a satirical post).